During a U.S. Senate hearing, Senator Ron Johnson questioned former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) head Dr. Robert Redfield (2018-2021) about the COVID-19 mRNA injections. Dr. Redfield made some surprising admissions regarding the mandated mRNA injections, highlighting the dangers and discrepancies between public information and the actual nature of the shots.
Dr. Redfield is an American virologist and physician who served for 20 years in the Army Medical Corps. Before his role at the CDC, he was a professor of medicine and microbiology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and co-founded the Institute of Human Virology.
Dr. Redfield stated he does not administer the mRNA shots in his practice because the spike proteins they produce are “toxic to the body.” He first addressed the misleading narrative that mRNA COVID-19 shots would degrade quickly, similar to natural mRNA. In reality, the shots used modified mRNA designed to remain active for an unknown period, continuing to produce toxic spike proteins—a fact not disclosed to the public.
By the summer of 2021, it became clear that the mRNA persisted in the body far longer than natural mRNA, sometimes for months, according to Dr. Redfield. The CDC learned of this discrepancy when Japanese regulators released their studies.
Additionally, nano-lipid particles were intended to distribute the spike protein throughout the body rather than localizing it in the arm. This distribution meant the spike proteins could reach the ovaries and adrenal glands and even cross the blood-brain barrier. Dr. Redfield confirmed that these particles allow the injected material to penetrate heart cells. He concluded that the injections should never have been mandated, as they do not prevent infection and have side effects.
As more evidence emerges about the harmful effects of mRNA injections, authoritative voices like Dr. Redfield are testifying about their dangers. The question remains: when will there be real consequences for those who released these shots to the public, misinformed them, and withheld critical information that would have allowed for true informed consent?
