Apparently, we’ve reached the point where even delivering news on social media has become a gender issue. According to a new study by Pew Research, men dominate the online news delivery space, comprising 63% of influencers compared to 30% who are women. Naturally, this revelation has sent the usual suspects into a frenzy, with headlines implying that this disparity is yet another glaring example of systemic inequality. But let’s take a moment to unpack what’s really going on here.
First, can we all agree that this isn’t exactly breaking news? Men and women approach communication differently—it’s been that way for centuries. Men, generally speaking, tend to be more assertive in sharing opinions, while women often gravitate toward building relationships and fostering community. It’s not rocket science; it’s human nature. But in today’s hyper-politicized culture, even these simple truths are treated as scandalous.
The Pew study examined influencers who regularly share news on social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. The findings? Men are more likely to post news stories, offer commentary, and build large followings based on their takes. Women, on the other hand, were found to engage more through comments and sharing posts rather than originating the news themselves. This difference in approach isn’t inherently good or bad—it just is. Yet somehow, it’s now framed as a crisis.
The media’s reaction to this study has been predictably over-the-top. Articles and opinion pieces lament the “inequity” of it all, as though Twitter is some kind of exclusive boys’ club rather than the digital free-for-all that it truly is. The underlying implication, of course, is that men are somehow gatekeeping news, preventing women from breaking into the space. But here’s the thing: social media is the great equalizer. Anyone with an internet connection and something to say can build a following. The idea that women are being held back in this space is as absurd as it is insulting.
Let’s be clear about what’s really driving this narrative. It’s not about the actual numbers; it’s about controlling the flow of information. The Left is obsessed with equity, not in the sense of creating equal opportunities, but in manufacturing equal outcomes. If there aren’t enough women dominating the online news scene, then clearly the system must be rigged—or so they’d have you believe. Never mind the fact that some of the most influential voices on social media today are women, like Bari Weiss, Megyn Kelly, and Candace Owens. Apparently, their success doesn’t fit the narrative, so it’s conveniently ignored.
There’s also a deeper irony here. Many of the same people lamenting male dominance in social media news are the first to decry the so-called “patriarchy” whenever a man dares to share an opinion online. They want men to “check their privilege” and step back, but then they complain when men are the ones shaping the conversation. It’s a no-win situation designed to silence dissenting voices while promoting a narrow, progressive agenda.
What this study really shows is that people are drawn to voices that resonate with them, regardless of gender. Men aren’t dominating social media news because of some shadowy conspiracy; they’re doing it because they’re willing to put their opinions out there, often at great personal risk. The online world is not exactly a friendly place for bold, unfiltered commentary—just ask anyone who’s been canceled for daring to question the woke orthodoxy. If men are more willing to take those risks, should we really be surprised that they’re reaping the rewards?
Ultimately, this is yet another example of the Left’s obsession with making every aspect of life a battleground for identity politics. Instead of celebrating the diversity of voices online, they’d rather nitpick statistics to manufacture outrage. The truth is, social media is a meritocracy—flawed, messy, and often chaotic, but a meritocracy nonetheless. The people who succeed aren’t the ones who check the most diversity boxes; they’re the ones who have something compelling to say.
So, here’s a thought: instead of fixating on who’s delivering the news, why not focus on the quality of the content? If you don’t like the voices dominating social media, offer an alternative. Build your own following. Engage with the ideas rather than the identity of the person sharing them. Because at the end of the day, the truth doesn’t care about your gender—it cares about being heard. And isn’t that what really matters?
